Reading Blog – Nov. 26th
Smith, Mark M. Sensing the past : seeing,
hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching in history. Berkeley : University of
California Press, 2007. Print.
Seeing, hearing,
smelling, tasting, add touching are the basic senses of human. The core
question in the reading is, how the senses changed through the history? What
roles have the five senses played and how do they affected our society?
We experience
these senses in our everyday life without doing anything. We usually just receive
the senses through our organs. In page 117, Smith wrote that most historians
and museum curators think that the sensory recreation for the past is both not
possible and desirable. But I think what these historians and curators mean is
to build a program that is only base on senses. For example, use only sounds to
present the American history. Maybe it will become the head line of the news
but it is not a way to operate a museum. But there are some commercial values
in senses. There are shops that sell different smells in bottles. The shops are
selling scents like, holy water, wet garden, dust, fire place, and even warm
spring. The shop does not only sell the scents that exist. Some scents such as
Italian kiss and California love are also in the list of choice.
I think what
Smith means in the book is that a history documentary is best in language
format, speaking and writing. An official documentary of history in smell or
hearing is just not the way to do it. Looking carefully into the current museum
program design, we can find out that there are installations of senses
Smith
points out that some scholars begun to insist that sensory history should offer
a usable way to help the history “live”. They are hoping to find a better way
to present their research and findings to the publics. I believe this is the
correct way of the sensory history but it seems impossible to do. The ultimate
question is how we recreate the senses in the past. All the materials that can
help identify the senses are not exists anymore. Do the people in the past recognize
the color like us? Different space-time background, different society,
different understanding of fact and standard can make everything so varied. With
the help of advanced technology we might be able to reach the goal but how to
translate and express the senses objectively will be a big challenge.
As for my object exhibition, this
reading gave me a new direction of conducting it. I am thinking about put the
top hat on a turning plate and surround it with some spot light. This design
can reveal the unique glossy surface of the hat.
沒有留言:
張貼留言